Background:
Paper-based routine health information systems often require repetitive data entry. In the West Bank, the primary health care system for maternal and child health was entirely paper-based, with care providers spending considerable amounts of time maintaining multiple files and client registers. As part of the phased national implementation of an electronic health information system, some of the primary health care clinics are now using an electronic registry (eRegistry) for maternal and child health. The eRegistry consists of client-level data entered by care providers at the point-of-care and supports several digital health interventions that are triggered by the documented clinical data, including guideline-based clinical decision support and automated public health reports.

Objective:
The aim of the eRegTime study is to investigate whether the use of the eRegistry leads to changes in time-efficiency in health information management by the care providers, compared with the paper-based systems.

Methods:
This is a substudy in a cluster randomized controlled trial (the eRegQual study) and uses the time-motion observational study design. The primary outcome is the time spent on health information management for antenatal care, informed and defined by workflow mapping in the clinics. We performed sample size estimations to enable the detection of a 25% change in time-efficiency with a 90% power using an intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.1 and an alpha of .05. We observed care providers for full workdays in 24 randomly selected primary health care clinics—12 using the eRegistry and 12 still using paper. Linear mixed effects models will be used to compare the time spent on health information management per client per care provider.

Results:
Although the objective of the eRegQual study is to assess the effectiveness of the eRegistry in improving quality of antenatal care, the results of the eRegTime study will contribute to process evaluation, supplementing the findings of the larger trial.

Conclusions:
Electronic health tools are expected to reduce workload for the care providers and thus improve efficiency of clinical work. To achieve these benefits, the implementation of such systems requires both integration with existing workflows and the creation of new workflows. Studies assessing the time-efficiency of electronic health information systems can inform policy decisions for implementations in resource-limited low- and middle-income settings.

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/13653

Marie Hella Lindberg1*, MPhil; Mahima Venkateswaran2,3*, MBBS, MSc; Khadija Abu Khader4, MPH; Tamara Awwad4, MPH; Buthaina Ghanem4, PharmD, MPH; Taghreed Hijaz5, MSc; Kjersti Mørkrid2, MPhil, PhD; J Frederik Frøen2,3, MD, PhD

1 Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT – the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

2 Global Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

3 Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

4 Palestinian National Institute of Public Health, World Health Organization, Al-Bireh, Occupied Palestinian Territory

5 Ministry of Health, Ramallah, Occupied Palestinian Territory

*these authors contributed equally